Political Analysis Serie - US-China Trade War: Temporary opportunities to Brazilian Agribusiness Sector

Photo: France Presse Agency

The Overview

Last 6th July, US President Donald Trump announced tariffs of US$ 34 billion on Chinese imports. It was the harshest measure in a global trade dispute between big nations recorded in recent years. On that occasion, China said it would be forced to retaliate imposing higher levies on goods that would ranging from American soybeans to pork. And the promise was fulfilled.

“The United States has violated World Trade Organization rules and ignited the largest trade war in Economic History,” China's Commerce Ministry said in a statement. “Such tariffs are typical trade bullying, and this action threatens global supply chains and value chains, stalls the global economic recovery, triggers global market turmoil, and will hurt more innocent multinational companies, enterprises and consumers”, said that Chinese official.

Thus, over the past week, US tariffs on $34 billion in Chinese products effectively went into effect. China responded by slapping 25% duties on the same amount in US goods. The trade war between the two nations had begun. As a new response, Trump's administration released last Tuesday its list of $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that it said it aims to subject to 10% tariffs following a review process. In counterpart, China threatened retaliatory action and pledged that it would lodge a complaint with the World Trade Organization.

The riskiest economic gamble of Trump's Presidency could spread as it enters a new phase by imposing direct costs on companies and consumers globally.

Beijing noticed that the US side had threatened to impose additional tariffs forward gradually should China take retaliatory measures. However, Chinese authorities want to demonstrate that this logic of trade intimidation will not make them flinch. For this purpose, in a tactical logic of time, China will have no choice but to consolidate other markets for its products and expand relations to alternative input providers during the “conflict”.

The Quorum’s View: during the conflict – and only during that time -, opportunities for the Brazilian Agribusiness Sector

In the Agricultural Raw Materials sector - if Beijing really wants to demonstrate its resistance to the trade war from Washington -, China will have to increase soybean imports from other countries to reduce reliance on buying from the United States.

Soybeans, crushed to make cooking oil and the protein-rich animal feed ingredient soymeal, were the biggest US agriculture export to China last year at a value of US$ 12,3 billion, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). China, which imports 60% of the soybeans traded worldwide, bought 32,9 million tons from the United States in 2017, accounting for 34% of the total purchases.

For this reason, showing concern on the trade war with the United States, the President of Chinese State Grains Trader (COFCO) Yu Xubo already said in an interview with the Communist Party’s official People’s Daily Paper last Wednesday that hefty import tariffs applied by Beijing on American goods, including soybeans, will inflate costs for Chinese farmers and potentially increase internal retail prices of foods, like pork, the nation’s favorite meat.

Thus, China could increase soybean imports from South American countries amid an escalating trade dispute with the United States. Beijing can also buy more rapeseed, sunflower seeds, and bring in more soybean meal, rapeseed meal, sunflower meal and fishmeal to fill any supply gaps. Increasing meat imports would be also an option.

In this regard, the trade conflict between Beijing and Washington is already boosting grain and oilseed exports from the Black Sea region, where major sellers including Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan are looking to sell more corn, wheat and soybean to the huge Chinese market. However, the isolated capacity of global offer of these regions is limited. For example, a Rabobank report said last week it reckoned China will have to buy 15 million tons of US beans with the new tariff this year because there aren’t enough alternative sources of beans from other major exporters.

That’s why Brazil could indirectly benefit from the intensifying US-China trade war. The South American country finds itself in a strategic position to increase its market share of soybean exports to China. The other major producer, Argentina, is not in much of a position to offer competition this year. Soybean production there has been hammered by poor weather conditions that mean its crop is expected to be the lowest in a decade.

This leaves the field open to Brazil as the main supplier of soybeans and at more competitive prices than the other options available on the market. Meanwhile, the weakness of the Brazilian currency enhances farmers’ margins when compared with the more expensive US grains that, despite the drop in prices caused by the US-China trade dispute, are still not as attractive.

However, there are doubts over how quickly Brazil will be able to react to the new trading situation in the aftermath of a Truckers Strike protesting high fuel costs that halted transport of cargoes to ports for more than two weeks. In fact, regular loadings of cargoes at most ports weren’t impacted in the short term as the grains being sold were old crops stored in silos located near the port facilities. But it’s also true that Brazil still has structural problems in the logistics field and its freight costs are higher than the US and more sensitive to price shocks derived from increased demand.

All this involved, its possible to affirm that Brazil will have comparative advantages in its capacity to offer agricultural raw materials to China in this trade war environment against US. However - sooner or later -, once re-established the regular trade relations between Washington and Beijing, Brazil will lose these advantages and should be ready to readjust its volume of offers on the raw materials global markets. The evaluation of the correct moment to initiate this readjustment will depend on help of a good staff of analysts with focus on the changes of geopolitical scenarios to the global commodities sector.

Quorum Political Strategy is a government relations and political risk consulting firm made up of experienced professionals who can help your organization achieve its goals. We are a result-oriented consulting firm. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Sources: The Wall Street Journal, BBC, Mercopress Agency