17 setembro, 2018
On 13:30 by Quorum in Bolsonaro, Brazil, Brazilian Crisis, Brazilian Presidential Elections, Ciro Gomes, Geraldo Alckmin, Haddad, Lula, Political Consultancy, Political Risk No comments
In order: Bolsonaro, Ciro Gomes, Marina Silva, Alckmin and Fernando Haddad - Photo: "O Globo" Archives. |
Brazilian far-right presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro
held a solid lead ahead of the October 7th election following a serious
stabbing suffered during a popular rally 10 days ago. However, Workers Party
(PT) candidate Fernando Haddad emerged in second place, signaling a potential
polarized right-left runoff, a poll (CNT/MDA) showed this Monday morning.
Bolsonaro, who is in the hospital and unable to campaign,
has 28,2% of voter support, according to the survey by pollster MDA. Haddad, who
replaced imprisoned former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on the ticket
last week, had 17,6% in his first showing in an MDA poll.
Haddad’s numbers indicated that Lula, banned from running
due to a corruption conviction, was successfully transferring his support to
the former São Paulo mayor, who is well placed to face off with Bolsonaro in the
second round in late October.
Center-leftist Ciro Gomes had 10,8% of voter intentions
and business-friendly candidate Geraldo Alckmin was fourth with 6,1%, while
environmentalist Marina Silva trailed with 4,1%.
Perspectives
to a posible Runoff
In a runoff, which would be triggered if no candidate
wins half of the valid votes, Bolsonaro would defeat all other candidates,
except Ciro Gomes, with whom he is statistically tied (37,8% for Ciro, against
36,1% for Bolsonaro), MDA said.
One in four voters are still undecided or say they will
annul or leave their ballot blank in Brazil’s most uncertain election in a generation.
Other polls published last week showed Bolsonaro losing a
runoff against most other candidates.
The nationwide MDA survey of 2.002 people was carried out
for the transportation sector lobby CNT (National Confederation of Transport)
between September 12th and 15th and had a margin of error of 2,2%, meaning
results could vary that much either way.
Sources:
Mercopress Agency, Reuters, Investing.com
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
Search
Eleições 2020
Análises | Pensando Relações Governamentais
Postagens populares
-
Após mais de 9 horas de debates, trocas de acusações e gritos de “Fora Dilma” e de “Não vai ter golpe”, a Comissão Especial do Impeachment...
Posts
-
►
20
(3)
- ► agosto 2020 (2)
- ► julho 2020 (1)
-
►
19
(1)
- ► janeiro 2019 (1)
-
▼
18
(24)
- ► outubro 2018 (1)
- ▼ setembro 2018 (2)
- ► agosto 2018 (2)
- ► julho 2018 (3)
- ► junho 2018 (6)
- ► abril 2018 (3)
- ► março 2018 (3)
- ► fevereiro 2018 (2)
-
►
17
(36)
- ► dezembro 2017 (1)
- ► novembro 2017 (1)
- ► setembro 2017 (2)
- ► agosto 2017 (2)
- ► julho 2017 (2)
- ► abril 2017 (4)
- ► março 2017 (6)
- ► fevereiro 2017 (6)
- ► janeiro 2017 (9)
-
►
16
(80)
- ► dezembro 2016 (11)
- ► novembro 2016 (14)
- ► outubro 2016 (9)
- ► setembro 2016 (2)
- ► agosto 2016 (11)
- ► julho 2016 (3)
- ► junho 2016 (5)
- ► abril 2016 (13)
- ► março 2016 (6)
- ► janeiro 2016 (1)
-
►
15
(143)
- ► dezembro 2015 (10)
- ► novembro 2015 (12)
- ► outubro 2015 (10)
- ► setembro 2015 (17)
- ► agosto 2015 (15)
- ► julho 2015 (6)
- ► junho 2015 (8)
- ► abril 2015 (9)
- ► março 2015 (8)
- ► fevereiro 2015 (16)
- ► janeiro 2015 (18)
-
►
14
(22)
- ► dezembro 2014 (22)
Customizado por Quorum EstratégiaPolítica e Relações Governamentais. Tecnologia do Blogger.
0 comments:
Postar um comentário